gospel of barnabas is not accurate

[EricB]

I saw the videos on youtube, but I'm still not convinced that this Church has all the right answers.

No disrespect intended, but you guys make a lot of claims that are hard to accept. Your "proof" is also not 100% reliable.

For example, the gospel of barnabas is not a reliable book for the truth. There are many errors in that book, including geographical errors about the locations of known cities and harbours, etc. Some of the places mentioned in that book talks about them being near rivers or harbours that don't actually exist. The description of Palestine for example, shows that the author of the gospel of barnabas was not familiar with its geography. He alleged that Jesus sailed to Nazareth—an inland city with no connecting water entry. There are other such mistakes, made obviously by an author who lacks a proper worldly education for his time.

Also, the gospel of barnabas says that Jesus was born when Pilate was governor, but history records Pilate becoming governor in A.D. 26 or 27—long after Jesus’ birth.

Trustworthy scholars have exposed the Gospel of Barnabas as a counterfeit. Therefore, it cannot be trusted as the biography of Jesus’ life.

This book conveniently supports the greatness of Islam and the prophet Muhammad, but has nothing nice to say about Christianity. To me, this sounds like a Moslem person trying to prove that his religion is the right one, and Christianity is the wrong one.

Sorry if I offended anyone, but I am also looking for the truth, but I don't think I found it here.

A reply by anyone would be appreciated.